The Withdrawal of US Troops from Afghanistan a year ago marked the end of America’s longest war, a military intervention that cost $2 trillion and killed more than 200,000 people.
Polling indicates that Americans believe the withdrawal was a mistake and that involvement in Afghanistan was not worth it. Nevertheless, the speed with which the Taliban took back control has left many Americans feeling confused about what happened in that country.
Impact on the Afghan National Security Forces (ANDSF)
The withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan is a major development that has a significant impact on the future of the country. In the past, the United States had invested tens of thousands of troops and billions of dollars in military aid to help maintain security and train Afghan security forces.
The withdrawal has also affected the political situation in Afghanistan, especially with regard to peace diplomacy. It has weakened the Afghan government and increased the fractious tendencies of the country’s elite.
As a result, the Taliban has continued to ramp up attacks on ANDSF bases and outposts, and has started to seize more territory across the country. This has led to a serious challenge for the U.S. In addition, a significant number of civilians have died as a result of these attacks.
This has impacted the economy of the country, leading to a reduction in government revenue. It has also made it more difficult for people to find work and increase the flow of refugees.
It has also prompted the Taliban to conduct more attacks with improvised explosive devices (IEDs). These indiscriminate attacks have killed and injured many civilians.
In the first half of 2020, over 5,183 civilians died or injured in a variety of different ways. More than two-thirds of the deaths attributed to the Taliban and other non-state actors.
Moreover, the withdrawal of US troops has also accelerated the deterioration of security in Afghanistan. This is because the Taliban has begun to encircle the government in at least 12 provincial capitals. This has made it harder for the government to conduct operations and keep track of the population in these areas.
Impact on the Afghan National Army (ANA)
The withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan is a major change, both for the country and the security forces. The military is probably the most likely to affected by this, as it made up of a largely former Northern Alliance militia force, with no previous professional army heritage and with only a small number of senior officers who have rejoined the ANA in recent years.
The ANA established in 2001, under US leadership, as the first non-NATO ally to receive full international support and funding (including weapons). The ANA has six corps, a Special Operations Force and a 111th Capital Division. ANA also equipped with three combat air wings, 24 branch and basic training schools, as well as depots, hospitals and other support facilities.
Despite this, the ANA has never been able to operate independently or to effectively support its own brigade-size and even its more elite combat units in the field. The latest reports from the Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction and the Lead Inspector General of the Department of Defense suggest that limited in-country U.S. and allied training, small U.S. and allied cadres, and bombing may not be sufficient to rescue Afghanistan’s military from failure.
At the same time, the ANA has faced challenges in reorganizing itself and the re-establishment of a functional peace process. Whether the re-establishment of the ANA will be successful or not depends on whether Afghans want the ANA and its territorial force, the ANA TF, to be a real part of Afghanistan’s future security.
The ANA TF, like the ALP, is based on mobilizing men from a local community and developing them into a defensive, hold force. It is supposed to be a more ‘local’ force than the ALP in that its members drawn from all sections of the community rather than from one particular group. However, it has a very long history, of war crimes, impunity and graft. Moreover, it has caught up in many of the same issues as the ALP.
Impact on the Afghan National Police (ANP)
The Afghan National Police (ANP) is the country’s central law enforcement agency and is a large, multi-service organization. Its responsibilities include enforcing all laws and regulations in Afghanistan, protecting individuals and property, combating crime, regulating public order and security, providing border and airport police services, and conducting criminal investigations.
The ANP, which includes uniformed police and specialized units dealing with public order, counter narcotics, and terrorism, has grown rapidly over the past seven years to 68,000 personnel, with a target end-strength of 86,000. This growth has fueled by international police assistance, particularly from the United States and the European Union.
During the past several years, the ANP has struggled to develop sufficient anti-crime and other community policing capabilities to support civilian security and maintain public order. This difficulty has compounded by the narcotics crisis in the country, which eroded the ANP’s ability to serve and protect citizens.
One major challenge facing the ANP is an increase in corruption. As drug production surged, the police became a major source of income for drug dealers and other criminals. This, in turn, exacerbated the problem of corruption within the ANP.
To address this issue, the ANP has implemented a number of reforms. These include the adoption of a democratic policing approach, which aims to build responsibility for the community in order to increase service to and reduce the frequency of crime.
The ANP has also established a number of Special Police Units, or PRCs, which are provincially-based units that specialize in civil order security and high-risk arrests. These units are partner with ISAF Special Operations Forces and U.S. forces for training and operations. In total, 19 PRCs have fielded throughout the country.
Impact on the Afghan National Defense Forces (ANDF)
The withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan is a major event for the country’s security forces. The US invested billions of dollars’ worth of manpower and military aid over the past 20 years to support Afghan forces and help train them to become more independent and resilient.
But the end of the US support means that many questions remain about how to sustain Afghanistan’s security forces in the future. There are several potential options, including bolstering the local defence force.
A key question is whether the local defence force can effectively ward off and counter the Taliban. The answer is that the local defence force has been successful in a few cases, but it needs further work to ensure its long-term effectiveness.
Amongst other things, the local defence force must ensure that its members are properly trained and receive adequate protection from the police. Moreover, it must be able to provide basic supplies such as food, fuel and water to its members.
This may be difficult for the national defence forces to accomplish without international assistance, as well as a strong sense of morale and a willingness to sacrifice their lives. A possible solution is to strengthen the national defence forces by funding their training and development.
There is an increasing number of international agencies that are now providing training, intelligence, and other services to the national defence forces in order to help them improve their operational capabilities. These agencies include the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), NATO and UNICEF.
The Afghan National Defense Forces are a vital component of Afghanistan’s security. They play an essential role in defending the country from terrorism, extremism and other threats. They are also a crucial part of the peace process.
Impact on the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF)
As the US troop withdrawal draws closer, it is becoming clear that Afghanistan is in serious trouble. It has lost billions of dollars in the economic crisis, 19 million people are facing food insecurity, and millions of children have had to sell their children’s bodies in order to survive.
A significant part of the problem is that the Afghan security forces are not yet prepared to fight a war against the insurgents, and are also not ready to win the political battle necessary to support the establishment of a legitimate government. If a real war is to be won, then the US and NATO/ISAF have to go beyond merely fighting an insurgency and provide effective civil-military action in the field.
To achieve this, the United States and the ANSF will have to make important decisions about force development, partnering, and civil-military efforts in the field. These must made as soon as possible and they should include improvements in force quality, a rapid expansion of ANSF forces to at least double their current size, and major reforms in the structure of mentoring and partnering capabilities.
There is little point in making the critical changes needed if these not followed by timely and effective civil-military action to build up Afghan provincial, district, and local governments. These efforts will have to integrated with a range of civil aid programs including leadership and development, basic services, and prompt justice and rule of law.
This will not be easy and a number of national caveats, restrictions on aid, and corrupt government officials will need to be remove in the process. However, it is a necessary step to prevent Afghanistan from falling into the same trap as Iraq.
